§FMCSR.com
Reading the regulations as they stood on December 31, 2020. Current text may differ.Switch to current
Current textIn force on Dec. 31, 2020Source: eCFR

§ 40.295 May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations?

Current wording, first on file in the 2001 annual edition.

eCFR as of December 31, 2020 ↗

(a) As an employee with a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation, when you have been evaluated by a SAP, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation in order to obtain another recommendation.

(b) As an employer, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation if the employee has already been evaluated by a qualified SAP. If the employee, contrary to paragraph (a) of this section, has obtained a second SAP evaluation, as an employer you may not rely on it for any purpose under this part.

Amendment history

1 distinct wording on file since Oct. 1, 2001
  1. Oct. 1, 2001 → presentannual editions 2001–2016viewing

A new entry appears whenever the regulatory words change between government snapshots. Day-precise from the eCFR (2017 onward); before that, one snapshot per annual CFR edition (revised as of October 1). Bracketed citations are the Federal Register history printed with the section.