Current textIn force on June 23, 2017Source: eCFR

§ 40.295 May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations?

Current wording, first on file in the 2001 annual edition.

eCFR as of June 23, 2017 ↗

49 CFR § 40.295 — May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations?. Text in force on June 23, 2017. This wording effective October 1, 2001 to present. Source: eCFR as of June 23, 2017, https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2017-06-23/title-49/section-40.295. Retrieved from FMCSR.com, https://fmcsr.com/reg/40.295?asof=2017-06-23, on October 26, 2026. Unofficial compilation; verify against the official source.

(a) As an employee with a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation, when you have been evaluated by a SAP, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation in order to obtain another recommendation.

(b) As an employer, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation if the employee has already been evaluated by a qualified SAP. If the employee, contrary to paragraph (a) of this section, has obtained a second SAP evaluation, as an employer you may not rely on it for any purpose under this part.

Amendment history

1 distinct wording on file since Oct. 1, 2001

Oct. 1, 2001 → presentannual editions 2001–2016viewing

A new entry appears whenever the regulatory words change between government snapshots. Day-precise from the eCFR (2017 onward); before that, one snapshot per annual CFR edition (revised as of October 1). Bracketed citations are the Federal Register history printed with the section.