Current textIn force on Sept. 30, 2010Source: annual CFR editions 2001–2016

§ 40.295 May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations?

Current wording, first on file in the 2001 annual edition.

govinfo, 2009 edition ↗

Before Jan. 1, 2017 the record is one snapshot per annual CFR edition, revised as of October 1. This is the 2009 edition's wording. An amendment that took effect between Oct. 1, 2009 and Sept. 30, 2010 would not appear until the next edition, so check the citations below and the Federal Register for exact effective dates.

49 CFR § 40.295 — May employees or employers seek a second SAP evaluation if they disagree with the first SAP's recommendations?. Text in force on September 30, 2010. This wording effective October 1, 2001 to present. Source: govinfo, 2009 edition, https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2009-title49-vol1/CFR-2009-title49-vol1-sec40-295. Retrieved from FMCSR.com, https://fmcsr.com/reg/40.295?asof=2010-09-30, on October 26, 2026. Unofficial compilation; verify against the official source.

(a) As an employee with a DOT drug and alcohol regulation violation, when you have been evaluated by a SAP, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation in order to obtain another recommendation.

(b) As an employer, you must not seek a second SAP's evaluation if the employee has already been evaluated by a qualified SAP. If the employee, contrary to paragraph (a) of this section, has obtained a second SAP evaluation, as an employer you may not rely on it for any purpose under this part.

Amendment history

1 distinct wording on file since Oct. 1, 2001

Oct. 1, 2001 → presentannual editions 2001–2016viewing

A new entry appears whenever the regulatory words change between government snapshots. Day-precise from the eCFR (2017 onward); before that, one snapshot per annual CFR edition (revised as of October 1). Bracketed citations are the Federal Register history printed with the section.