§FMCSR.com
Historical textIn force on Sept. 30, 2000Source: annual CFR editions 1998–1999

§ 385.15 Administrative review.

Wording in the annual edition revised as of Oct. 1, 1998, superseded by the 2000 annual edition.

govinfo, 1999 edition ↗
Before Jan. 1, 2017 the record is one snapshot per annual CFR edition, revised as of October 1. This is the 1999 edition's wording. An amendment that took effect between Oct. 1, 1999 and Sept. 30, 2000 would not appear until the next edition, so check the citations below and the Federal Register for exact effective dates.

(a) Within the 45 day notice period provided in § 385.11(d), or within 45 days after denial of a request for a change in rating as provided in § 385.17(g), the motor carrier may petition the FHWA for administrative review of a proposed or final safety rating by submitting a written request to the Director, Office of Motor Carrier Field Operations, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington DC 20590.

(b) The petition must state why the proposed safety rating is believed to be in error and list all factual and procedural issues in dispute. The petition may be accompanied by any information or documents the motor carrier is relying upon as the basis for its petition.

(c) The Director, Office of Motor Carrier Field Operations, may request the petitioner to submit additional data and attend a conference to discuss the safety rating. Failure to provide the information requested or attend the conference may result in dismissal of the petition.

(d) The petitioner shall be notified in writing of the decision on administrative review. The notification will occur within 30 days after receipt of a petition from a hazardous materials or passenger motor carrier.

(e) If the decision on administrative review results in a final rating of unsatisfactory for a hazardous materials or passenger motor carrier, the decision shall be accompanied by an appropriate out-of-service order.

(f) All other decisions on administrative review of ratings constitute final agency action. Thereafter, improvement in the rating may be obtained under § 385.17 of this part.

[62 FR 60043, Nov. 6, 1997]

Amendment history

8 distinct wordings on file since Oct. 1, 1996
  1. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010; 77 FR 28450, 28454, May 14, 2012; 86 FR 57070, Oct. 14, 2021]
  2. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010; 77 FR 28450, 28454, May 14, 2012]
  3. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010; 77 FR 28454, May 14, 2012]
  4. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007; 75 FR 17241, Apr. 5, 2010]
  5. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 55701, Oct. 1, 2007]
  6. [65 FR 50935, Aug. 22, 2000]
  7. Oct. 1, 1998 → Oct. 1, 2000annual editions 1998–1999diff vs. previousviewing
    [62 FR 60043, Nov. 6, 1997]
  8. [56 FR 40806, Aug. 16, 1991]

A new entry appears whenever the regulatory words change between government snapshots. Day-precise from the eCFR (2017 onward); before that, one snapshot per annual CFR edition (revised as of October 1). Bracketed citations are the Federal Register history printed with the section.